Search
High-Risk Beta
This platform is experimental. Smart contracts are unaudited. Use at your own risk.
High-Risk Beta
This platform is experimental. Smart contracts are unaudited. Use at your own risk.
Gnosis· closedAuthor: Philipp-Alexander Blum (@Citrullin) Status: Phase 3 (Direct Snapshot Referendum) Category: Governance, Transparency & Contributor Rights Voting System: Single-Choice Voting (YES / NO / ABSTAIN)
This proposal puts a direct question to GNO token holders and validators: Should independent engineer and contributor Philipp Blum (@Citrullin) remain banned from GnosisDAO Discourse, Discord, and official communication channels?
Following the publication of an open-source proof-of-concept for a stateless zkEVM Account-Lattice and sustained critique of [GIP-153: Transition into the Ethereum Economic Zone (EEZ)](https://forum.gnosis.io/t/gip-153-should-gnosis-c
Connect your wallet to join the discussion.
No comments yet. Be the first to share your take.
Claim + evidence
Interpretations post onchain directly. Prediction stakes happen separately below.
ID: proposal:gnosis:0x11e2eb1c02f57a6e48790275e5ccd80685c0bd877a58bef3981b3b9f52ad6aa7
Cast your interpretation on this proposal via MO
Voting contract not deployed on this network