WED, 23 SEPT 2026 · EDITION 197 · BASE L2
Reason · article
The majority didn't decide whether the construction violated federal law, only that plaintiffs' purely aesthetic interests didn't allow them to assert a federal claim.
View source →https://reason.com/volokh/2026/08/31/supreme-court-allows-white-house-ballroom-construction-to-go-forward-at-least-for-now/Hash 0x853caf8504fb7e17145f3abce6df73bc416df6bd1898fdb0641bee15493c0d5d
Connect your wallet to join the discussion.
No comments yet. Be the first to share your take.